Reflections on the Successful Movement to Stop the Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Abstract
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) project was the plan of Duke and Dominion Energy to run a 600-mile fracked-gas pipeline through West Virginia, Virginia and allegedly ending in North Carolina. Although the ACP had state and federal government support plus the backing of two huge corporations, it was opposed by various Indigenous tribes, environmentalists, farmers, and a wide range of community organization agencies, statewide and regional environmental groups, and environmental law firms. The wisest commentators predicted that the pipeline would achieve a successful completion, but to the shock of many stakeholders, Duke and Dominion Energy cancelled the ACP project on July 5, 2020. Within our research, we assess the pipeline’s defeat and explain multiple factors that terminated this multibillion dollar project. This study demonstrates the use of both quantitative and qualitative research and analysis. The information derived from our analysis can be generalized and employed in: (1) establishing effective and successful opposition against expanding the use of fossil fuels; and (2) promoting environmental, energy, and climate concerns and the rapid shift needed to clean, renewable energy sources.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ppar.vol12p1
Abstract
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) project was the plan of Duke and Dominion Energy to run a 600-mile fracked-gas pipeline through West Virginia, Virginia and allegedly ending in North Carolina. Although the ACP had state and federal government support plus the backing of two huge corporations, it was opposed by various Indigenous tribes, environmentalists, farmers, and a wide range of community organization agencies, statewide and regional environmental groups, and environmental law firms. The wisest commentators predicted that the pipeline would achieve a successful completion, but to the shock of many stakeholders, Duke and Dominion Energy cancelled the ACP project on July 5, 2020. Within our research, we assess the pipeline’s defeat and explain multiple factors that terminated this multibillion dollar project. This study demonstrates the use of both quantitative and qualitative research and analysis. The information derived from our analysis can be generalized and employed in: (1) establishing effective and successful opposition against expanding the use of fossil fuels; and (2) promoting environmental, energy, and climate concerns and the rapid shift needed to clean, renewable energy sources.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ppar.vol12p1
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
![]() |
284 |
![]() |
292 |
![]() |
8688 |
![]() |
7492 |
![]() |
1043867 |
![]() |
13 |